We think that is wrong. Not morally wrong, necessarily, but practically wrong — a failure of imagination and design rather than of intention. We have built elaborate systems to support physical health, financial stability, legal rights and material welfare. We have built almost nothing to support inspiration.
“The most damaging phrase in the language is: it’s always been done this way.”
Each experiment begins with the same underlying question: what if we designed this intentionally? What if the systems around us — economic, social, technological, sartorial — were built with inspiration as a first-order concern rather than an afterthought? What would that look like? What would it require? What might it change?
We are not naive about the distance between a conceptual experiment and a functioning institution. That distance is vast and the obstacles are real. But the history of ideas suggests that the distance between an unthinkable proposal and an obvious one can collapse surprisingly quickly, given the right conditions. Universal healthcare was once a radical experiment. So was the public library.
This is not utopian thinking. It is engineering thinking applied to an unusually neglected domain. We are not asking whether inspiration matters — the evidence on that question is overwhelming. We are asking whether the conditions that make it possible could be deliberately constructed rather than accidentally encountered.
We believe they can. The experiments below are our first attempts to sketch what that construction might look like.